Md. Abdul Jalil, and Abu Hena Mostofa Kamal, (2014) Admissibility of covert surveillance evidence: a prolegomenon. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, 18 . pp. 9-26. ISSN 1394-7729
This is the latest version of this item.
|
PDF
562kB |
Official URL: http://ejournal.ukm.my/juum
Abstract
This article presents the epistemology of a new but mostly neglected subject ‘admissibility of surveillance evidence.’ It addresses the complex issues around‘the proper limits of covert surveillance’ and ‘whether evidence obtained by the public authority in breach of statutory provision should be ruled inadmissible.’ Further, it analyses issues that have a profound relationship with ‘individual’s right of privacy’ and ‘public authority’s duties of conducting surveillance.’ In this research much emphasis is placed on case laws as persuasive precedents as there are no adequate statutory laws in some countries like Bangladesh and Malaysia which deal with this subject. It is hoped that the results of this research would attract the attention of policy-makers of some interested countries. It is also hoped that reasonable ethical and legal safeguards should be implemented to protect the rights of the people from future abuse.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Surveillance and interception; admissibility of surveillance evidence; right of privacy; intrusion of privacy |
Journal: | Jurnal Undang-undang dan Masyarakat |
ID Code: | 8456 |
Deposited By: | Ms Norliah Sukarno |
Deposited On: | 21 Mar 2015 14:44 |
Last Modified: | 14 May 2019 04:43 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Admissibility of covert surveillance evidence: a prolegomenon. (deposited 27 Mar 2015 08:48)
- Admissibility of covert surveillance evidence: a prolegomenon. (deposited 21 Mar 2015 14:44) [Currently Displayed]
Repository Staff Only: item control page