Comparison of several imputation techniques for log logistic model with covariate and interval censored data

Teea, Yuan Xin and Jayanthi Arasan, (2024) Comparison of several imputation techniques for log logistic model with covariate and interval censored data. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 20 (1). pp. 171-186. ISSN 2600-8602

[img]
Preview
PDF
950kB

Official URL: http://www.ukm.my/jqma

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to compare the performance of midpoint, right, and left imputation techniques for log logistic model with covariate and censored data. The maximum likelihood estimation method (MLE) is used to check the efficiency of imputation techniques by estimating the parameters. The performance of the estimates is evaluated based on their bias, standard error (SE), and root mean square error (RMSE) at different sample sizes, censoring proportions, and interval widths via a simulation study. Based on the results of the simulation study, the right imputation had the best overall performance. Finally, the proposed model is fitted to the real breast cancer data. The findings suggest that the log logistic model fits the breast cancer data well and the covariate of treatment significantly affects the time to cosmetic deterioration of the breast cancer patients.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Log logistic; Imputation techniques; Covariate; Right censored; Interval censored
Journal:Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis
ID Code:23629
Deposited By: Mr. Mohd Zukhairi Abdullah
Deposited On:06 Jun 2024 06:35
Last Modified:10 Jun 2024 01:33

Repository Staff Only: item control page